I used to be having a discussion with a friend today who, although really liberal on most issues, is definitely somewhat middle of the road when it comes to gun control. He is not really against concealed carry, but does favor far more background record checks – especially on product sales from a private individual in order to private individual.
He is a little surprised that I am against this. “Why? “, he requested.
First, let me preface our reasoning with a little information about me.
If you beloved this write-up and you would like to obtain a lot more information about hellcat springfield kindly go to our own web-site.
I am not an anarchist. We are not a doomsday prepper. I do not believe we are expected for a revolution, certainly not within my lifetime. I like getting SOME government (don’t inform my anti-statist friends though). All of these beliefs being so , I must admit that I perform fear for the generations which come after my death (I do hope to have at least another 40 years, which would obtain me into my 80s).
So back to my friend. Precisely why do I disagree with him? Well, it is simple. Background checks on every sale, particularly private individual to private individual, would lead to a nationwide gun registry. I am very much against having one of these brilliant.
My friend countered, very happily I might add, that we should register our cars. Why not our guns? This is basic. Nowhere in the constitution does it guarantee the right to keep and own cars. We all caved on the licensing of cars and drivers about a 100 years ago.
Our founding dads specifically put verbiage in the constitution allowing us to help keep and bear arms. You will find different interpretations as to what these people meant, but I believe a minimum of part of their reasoning was so that we could protect yourself from a tyrannical government or even those who wish to do us harm.
Do I believe that our own government is tyrannical? Properly, not quite yet. We are nevertheless the most free nation on earth. I do not like to route our country is on, but I do not feel it is to late to correct the ship.
Having a national gun registry would lead to forced gun buy-backs or perhaps confiscation during some future crisis (either natural or even man-made). Having our abilities to defend ourselves from criminals and/or government listed in the database would be sharing info that is way too personal.
The road to hell is made with good intentions. Govt is good at making us believe that being safer (their definition) is well worth giving up a few rights. Forcing people everywhere to register their personal, constitutionally protected guns is a bad idea.
I can foresee that guns would even get tied to addresses where their owners no longer live. What if you moved into a house where the previous occupants a new number of guns registered as well as the police came looking for all those folks? We all know that police, most of them being great people, do make mistakes when their own adrenaline levels are too high. Would you want your home getting shot up because the previous citizens had guns listed in the registry?
During a so-called “state of emergency” you can wager some local, state or even national governments would make a move to take any weapons that did not reside in the hands of government personnel. It has already happened. See the video below.
I believe it is nothing of the government’s business easily own a gun (or guns). Yes, I have to do the exact same background check as other people when I buy a new gun. But do you think that developing a national registry would keep guns out of the hands of individuals who could not pass a background check? Not a possibility. I believe you would see a lot of gun owners reporting their own guns stolen in order to sell their guns to whomever they desire – just as they can now.
When times obtain bad, whose doors are usually agents of the government (police or military ) likely to be knocking down when they go on their gun selection binges? I’ll tell you – the door’s that are for the addresses contained in the gun registry.
While we do not currently have a government that leg techinques in doors and gives fuel showers or firing squads to people they do not like, all of us do not know what our authorities will look like in 50 or 100 years. I want my children and grandchildren to be able to defend themselves from both the tyrannical government or a homicidal maniac (I suppose they could be one and the same though).
Starting a national weapon registry is the first phase to taking guns through people the government does not need possessing guns. Currently these people are felons and those with mental problems. Who might these types of future gunless people become? People of particular political parties? People of certain economic classes? People of certain religions? It has just about all happened throughout world background. We pretend to be the enlightened Americans but we have factions that want to take all our own freedoms and give all the capacity to the government just like dictators associated with past and present most of us have heard of.
How does this occur? We have to look at it from 2 avenues. First the gradual loss of gun rights for everyone through new “minor” restrictive gun laws. Second, the entire loss of gun rights regarding specific groups of people the federal government has targeted. Imagine the candle burning at both ends. As one end burns up, more and more of the governments enemies are specifically forbidden to have guns. As the other end burns, more and more of the general population are getting the remainder of the gun rights taken away too. When the flames meet in the middle we are left with no guns for anybody, and we have an authorities with nothing to fear. This is the nightmare of the slippery incline.